M2 Max vs Xeon E-2468

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon E-2468

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
Similar parts
·······

M2 Max vs Xeon E-2468 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M2 Max vs Xeon E-2468 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M2 Max vs Xeon E-2468: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M2 Max

2023

Why buy it

  • +0.6% higher PassMark.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
  • Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M2 Max GPU, while Xeon E-2468 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2468, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E-2468

2023

Why buy it

  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (26,652 vs 26,824).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 48 MB).
  • 80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
  • No integrated graphics, while M2 Max can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is M2 Max better than Xeon E-2468?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2468 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M2 Max is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M2 Max is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 24 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
M2 Max still makes the most sense overall. M2 Max comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Xeon E-2468 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

M2 Max vs Xeon E-2468 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Xeon E-2468

The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.

Processing Power

The M2 Max packs 12 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2468 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the M2 Max has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 33.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 2.424 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Xeon E-2468 is built on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. In PassMark, the M2 Max scores 26,824 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 0.6% lead for the M2 Max. L3 cache: 48 MB on the M2 Max vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.

FeatureM2 MaxXeon E-2468
Cores / Threads
12 / 12+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.7 GHz
5.2 GHz+41%
Base Clock
2.424 GHz
2.6 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
48 MB+100%
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
36 MB+1700%
2 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-29%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark
26,824
26,652
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M2 Max uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2468 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureM2 MaxXeon E-2468
Socket
none
LGA1700
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Virtualization (M2 Max) / not specified (Xeon E-2468). The M2 Max includes integrated graphics (Apple M2 Max GPU), while the Xeon E-2468 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: M2 Max targets Mobile.

FeatureM2 MaxXeon E-2468
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Apple M2 Max GPU
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Virtualization
Target Use
Mobile