EPYC 4244P vs M2 Max

AMD

EPYC 4244P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’
VS

M2 Max

12 Cores12 Thrd36 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2023

Popular choices:

β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’β€’

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
  • ❌80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.

M2 Max

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark (26,824 vs 27,164).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4244P better than M2 Max?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4244P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M2 Max is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4244P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 13.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4244P is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4244P still looks like the safer overall buy. EPYC 4244P is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4244P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 12/12, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetEPYC 4244PM2 Max
1080p
low246 FPS189 FPS
medium228 FPS152 FPS
high197 FPS124 FPS
ultra171 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low217 FPS155 FPS
medium182 FPS121 FPS
high151 FPS94 FPS
ultra133 FPS76 FPS
4K
low151 FPS71 FPS
medium127 FPS59 FPS
high99 FPS46 FPS
ultra85 FPS38 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetEPYC 4244PM2 Max
1080p
low525 FPS505 FPS
medium441 FPS437 FPS
high370 FPS342 FPS
ultra332 FPS279 FPS
1440p
low451 FPS429 FPS
medium392 FPS379 FPS
high333 FPS306 FPS
ultra288 FPS240 FPS
4K
low283 FPS266 FPS
medium251 FPS239 FPS
high234 FPS210 FPS
ultra203 FPS173 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetEPYC 4244PM2 Max
1080p
low679 FPS671 FPS
medium679 FPS670 FPS
high679 FPS625 FPS
ultra679 FPS552 FPS
1440p
low679 FPS605 FPS
medium679 FPS483 FPS
high679 FPS444 FPS
ultra621 FPS388 FPS
4K
low539 FPS423 FPS
medium471 FPS329 FPS
high411 FPS292 FPS
ultra341 FPS234 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetEPYC 4244PM2 Max
1080p
low679 FPS671 FPS
medium679 FPS671 FPS
high679 FPS671 FPS
ultra679 FPS668 FPS
1440p
low679 FPS671 FPS
medium679 FPS663 FPS
high679 FPS569 FPS
ultra645 FPS489 FPS
4K
low675 FPS545 FPS
medium594 FPS486 FPS
high526 FPS427 FPS
ultra437 FPS368 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4244P and M2 Max

AMD

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

M2 Max

The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads β€” the M2 Max has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max β€” a 31.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The EPYC 4244P is built on the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the M2 Max's 26,824 β€” a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 4244P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.

FeatureEPYC 4244PM2 Max
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
12 / 12+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+38%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+57%
2.424 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)
48 MB+50%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
36 MB+3500%
Process
5 nm
5 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023βˆ’2025)
β€”
PassMark
27,164+1%
26,824
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,244
β€”
Geekbench 6 Single
2,602
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,244
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4244P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB β€” 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4244P) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4244P) vs 0 (M2 Max) β€” the EPYC 4244P offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureEPYC 4244PM2 Max
Socket
AM5
none
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
LPDDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+100%
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
Yes
No
PCIe Lanes
28
0
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4244P supports AVX-512 instructions β€” important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics β€” Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4244P) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server, M2 Max targets Mobile. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.

FeatureEPYC 4244PM2 Max
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Apple M2 Max GPU
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Virtualization
Target Use
Entry Server
Mobile