
EPYC 4244P
Popular choices:

M2 Max
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
EPYC 4244P
2024Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- β80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (26,824 vs 27,164).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 4244P
2024M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- β +50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- β80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (26,824 vs 27,164).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4244P better than M2 Max?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 246 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 441 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 370 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 332 FPS | 279 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 451 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 392 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 288 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 283 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 670 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 625 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 444 FPS |
| ultra | 621 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 539 FPS | 423 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 329 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| ultra | 679 FPS | 668 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 679 FPS | 671 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 663 FPS |
| high | 679 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 489 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 675 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 594 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 526 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 437 FPS | 368 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of EPYC 4244P and M2 Max

EPYC 4244P
EPYC 4244P
The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.
M2 Max
M2 Max
The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MBΒ +Β 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads β the M2 Max has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max β a 31.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The EPYC 4244P is built on the Raphael (2023β2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the M2 Max's 26,824 β a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 4244P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 12+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+38% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+57% | 2.424 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 48 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 36 MB+3500% |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023β2025) | β |
| PassMark | 27,164+1% | 26,824 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,244 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,602 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,244 | β |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-5200 memory speed. The EPYC 4244P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB β 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4244P) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4244P) vs 0 (M2 Max) β the EPYC 4244P offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+100% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4244P supports AVX-512 instructions β important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics β Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4244P) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server, M2 Max targets Mobile. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Apple M2 Max GPU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | Virtualization |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













