
EPYC 4244P

M2 Max
EPYC 4244P vs M2 Max Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4244P vs M2 Max FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4244P vs M2 Max: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4244P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,824 vs 27,164).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4244P better than M2 Max?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4244P vs M2 Max Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4244P
The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.
M2 Max
The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M2 Max has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max — a 31.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The EPYC 4244P is built on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the M2 Max's 26,824 — a 1.3% lead for the EPYC 4244P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 12+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+38% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+57% | 2.424 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 48 MB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 36 MB+3500% |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Raphael (2023−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 27,164+1% | 26,824 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 11,244 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,602 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,244 | — |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4244P versus LPDDR5-6400 on the M2 Max — the M2 Max supports 23.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4244P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4244P) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4244P) vs 0 (M2 Max) — the EPYC 4244P offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200 | LPDDR5-6400+23% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+100% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the EPYC 4244P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4244P) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server, M2 Max targets Mobile. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.
| Feature | EPYC 4244P | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | Apple M2 Max GPU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vi | Virtualization |
| Target Use | Entry Server | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















