EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6252

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6252 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4244P

6 / 12

27,164

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6252

24 / 48

27,148

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6252 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6252: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon Gold 6252 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Gold 6252

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,148 vs 27,164).
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 4244P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4244P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4244P better than Xeon Gold 6252?

Yes. EPYC 4244P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4244P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4244P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4244P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 4244P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4244P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2019), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 24/48, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6252 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

Xeon Gold 6252

The Xeon Gold 6252 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 24 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,148 points. Launch price was $3,655.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6252 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Gold 6252 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6252 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Xeon Gold 6252's 27,148 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 4244P. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6252.

Feature	EPYC 4244P	Xeon Gold 6252
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	24 / 48+300%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+38%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+81%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)	35.75 MB+12%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	24 MB+2300%
Process	5 nm-64%	14 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	27,164	27,148
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,244	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,602	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6252 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 4244P	Xeon Gold 6252
Socket	AM5	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6252). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6252 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.