Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 4244P

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 4244P Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900H

14 / 20

27,444

+1.0%

27,164

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 4244P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 4244P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while EPYC 4244P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4244P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,164 vs 27,444).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900H better than EPYC 4244P?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4244P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900H is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900H is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900H comes in at an unclear MSRP at $617 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4244P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 4244P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 4244P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 4244P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the EPYC 4244P's 27,164 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	EPYC 4244P
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+133%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+6%	5.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.8 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	27,444+1%	27,164
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,244
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,602
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,244

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 4244P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	EPYC 4244P
Socket	FCBGA1744	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	—	192 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-13900H) / AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Core i9-13900H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.