Core i9-13900H
VS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Intel

Core i9-13900H

14 Cores20 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-13900H

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
107%
#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
103%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
100%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
98%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
95%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
93%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i9-13900H delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i9-13900HRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($617)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i9-13900HRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($617)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-13900H and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

Intel

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

FeatureCore i9-13900HRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5.4 GHz+4%
5.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
4 GHz+54%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
8 MB+300%
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
27,444
27,318
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,605
Geekbench 6 Multi
10,348
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i9-13900HRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-13900H) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Core i9-13900H requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i9-13900HRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
AVX-512
Yes
Virtualization
Yes