
Core i9-13900H

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-13900H
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌462.5% higher power demand at 45W vs 8W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 45W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i9-13900H needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (27,318 vs 27,444).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-13900H better than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-13900H vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900H
The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.4 GHz+4% | 5.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz | 4 GHz+54% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total)+50% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 27,444 | 27,318 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-13900H) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Core i9-13900H requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-13900H | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













