Core i9-13900H vs Xeon Silver 4410T

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900H vs Xeon Silver 4410T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900H vs Xeon Silver 4410T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while Xeon Silver 4410T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-13900H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,444).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900H better than Xeon Silver 4410T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Silver 4410T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-13900H is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900H is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900H comes in at an unclear MSRP at $617 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-13900H vs Xeon Silver 4410T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

Xeon Silver 4410T

The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	Xeon Silver 4410T
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+40%	10 / 20
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+35%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	2.7 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	26.25 MB+9%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	27,444	27,245

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.