Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 72F3

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 72F3 Performance Spectrum

Core i9-13900H

14 / 20

27,444

+0.7%

27,252

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 72F3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 72F3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-13900H

2023

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 180W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $617 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 72F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 27,444).
❌300% higher power demand at 180W vs 45W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-13900H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-13900H better than EPYC 72F3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 72F3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-13900H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-13900H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-13900H is the better buy right now. Core i9-13900H comes in at an unclear MSRP at $617 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 72F3 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 5.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (44.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-13900H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FCBGA1744 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-13900H vs EPYC 72F3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-13900H

The Core i9-13900H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,444 points. Launch price was $617.

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-13900H packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 72F3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-13900H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Core i9-13900H versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 — a 27.4% clock advantage for the Core i9-13900H (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i9-13900H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 72F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core i9-13900H scores 27,444 against the EPYC 72F3's 27,252 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i9-13900H. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i9-13900H vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3.

Feature	Core i9-13900H	EPYC 72F3
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+75%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+32%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm+
Architecture	Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)	Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark	27,444	27,252

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-13900H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 72F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.