EPYC 72F3 vs EPYC 4244P

EPYC 72F3 vs EPYC 4244P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 72F3

8 / 16

27,252

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

EPYC 4244P

6 / 12

27,164

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 72F3 vs EPYC 4244P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 72F3 vs EPYC 4244P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 72F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while EPYC 4244P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4244P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 72F3 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,164 vs 27,252).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 72F3 better than EPYC 4244P?

Yes. EPYC 72F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 72F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 72F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 72F3 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 72F3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4244P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of SP3, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 72F3 vs EPYC 4244P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 72F3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 4244P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the EPYC 72F3 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 versus 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P — a 21.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The EPYC 72F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the EPYC 4244P uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 72F3 scores 27,252 against the EPYC 4244P's 27,164 — a 0.3% lead for the EPYC 72F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3 vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P.

Feature	EPYC 72F3	EPYC 4244P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz	5.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock	3.7 GHz	3.8 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm+	5 nm-29%
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	27,252	27,164
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	11,244
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,602
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	11,244

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 72F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 4244P uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 72F3	EPYC 4244P
Socket	SP3	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity	—	192 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	28

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 72F3) / AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 72F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.