EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon D-2775TE

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon D-2775TE Performance Spectrum

EPYC 72F3

8 / 16

27,252

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon D-2775TE

16 / 32

27,299

+0.2%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon D-2775TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon D-2775TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 72F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +36.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 27,299).
❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-2775TE better than EPYC 72F3?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 72F3 is ahead with a 36.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2775TE pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. EPYC 72F3 also has the bigger cache pool with 924% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 25 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2775TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-2775TE still makes the most sense overall. Xeon D-2775TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2775TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2021) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon D-2775TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

Xeon D-2775TE

The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 72F3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE — a 27.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 72F3 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2 GHz). The EPYC 72F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 72F3 scores 27,252 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon D-2775TE. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.

Feature	EPYC 72F3	Xeon D-2775TE
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+32%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+85%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+924%	25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm+-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	27,252	27,299

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 72F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.