EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon Silver 4410T

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon Silver 4410T Performance Spectrum

EPYC 72F3

8 / 16

27,252

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX

Xeon Silver 4410T

10 / 20

27,245

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon Silver 4410T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon Silver 4410T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 72F3

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌20% higher power demand at 180W vs 150W.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Xeon Silver 4410T moves to LGA4677 and DDR5.

Xeon Silver 4410T

2023

Why buy it

✅Draws 150W instead of 180W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4677 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 72F3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (27,245 vs 27,252).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 72F3 better than Xeon Silver 4410T?

Yes. EPYC 72F3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 72F3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a clear cache advantage at 256 MB versus 26 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 72F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 875.2% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 26 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 72F3 still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 72F3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4410T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of SP3. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon Silver 4410T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

Xeon Silver 4410T

The Xeon Silver 4410T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 26.25 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4000. Passmark benchmark score: 27,245 points. Launch price was $624.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 72F3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Silver 4410T offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon Silver 4410T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4410T — a 2.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 72F3 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The EPYC 72F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 72F3 scores 27,252 against the Xeon Silver 4410T's 27,245 — a 0% lead for the EPYC 72F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3 vs 26.25 MB on the Xeon Silver 4410T.

Feature	EPYC 72F3	Xeon Silver 4410T
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	10 / 20+25%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+2%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+37%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+875%	26.25 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm+	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	27,252	27,245

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 72F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Silver 4410T uses LGA4677 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.