EPYC 72F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 72F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 72F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 72F3

2021

Why buy it

✅+700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,252 vs 27,487).

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $999 MSRP, while EPYC 72F3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 1950X better than EPYC 72F3?

Yes. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is the better buy right now. Ryzen Threadripper 1950X comes in at an unclear MSRP at $999 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 72F3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2017) and 700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB). That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 72F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

The Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 27,487 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 72F3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X — a 2.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 72F3 (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The EPYC 72F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 72F3 scores 27,252 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X's 27,487 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.

Feature	EPYC 72F3	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+2%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+9%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	256 MB (total)+700%	32 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	7 nm+-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Milan (2021−2023)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	27,252	27,487
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,040
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	9,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 72F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 72F3	Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Socket	SP3	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	—	256 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (EPYC 72F3) / AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 1950X). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 1950X targets Workstation.