EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6154

AMD

EPYC 4244P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon Gold 6154

18 Cores36 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2017

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6154 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6154 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6154: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…+29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
  • βœ…Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (27,164 vs 27,457).

Xeon Gold 6154

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…+1.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
  • ❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
  • ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while EPYC 4244P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4244P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4244P better than Xeon Gold 6154?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4244P is ahead with a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6154 pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. EPYC 4244P also has the bigger cache pool with 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 6154 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 18 cores and 36 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 4244P still makes the most sense overall. EPYC 4244P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4244P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, 29.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 6154 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

Intel

Xeon Gold 6154

The Xeon Gold 6154 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 27,457 points. Launch price was $3,543.

⚑

Processing Power

The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6154 offers 18 cores / 36 threads β€” the Xeon Gold 6154 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6154 β€” a 31.8% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6154 uses Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Xeon Gold 6154's 27,457 β€” a 1.1% lead for the Xeon Gold 6154. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 24.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 6154.

FeatureEPYC 4244PXeon Gold 6154
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
18 / 36+200%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+38%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+27%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+29%
24.75 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
5 nm-64%
14 nm
Architecture
Raphael (2023βˆ’2025)
Skylake (server) (2017βˆ’2018)
PassMark
27,164
27,457+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,244
β€”
Geekbench 6 Single
2,602
β€”
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,244
β€”
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6154 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureEPYC 4244PXeon Gold 6154
Socket
AM5
LGA3647
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
β€”
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
β€”
RAM Channels
2
β€”
ECC Support
Yes
β€”
PCIe Lanes
28
β€”
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) / not specified (Xeon Gold 6154). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 6154 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.

FeatureEPYC 4244PXeon Gold 6154
Integrated GPU
Yes
β€”
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
β€”
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
Yes
β€”
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
β€”
Target Use
Entry Server
β€”