EPYC 4244P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

AMD

EPYC 4244P

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
VS
AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd8 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023

EPYC 4244P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4244P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4244P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

  • βœ…+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 20.
  • βœ…40% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (11,244 vs 16,000).
  • ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

2023

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +7.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4244P, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than EPYC 4244P?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 4244P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 42.3% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4244P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4244P vs Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

AMD

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MBΒ +Β 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.

⚑

Processing Power

The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads β€” the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS β€” a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.8 GHz vs 4 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023βˆ’2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 β€” a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 11,244 vs 16,000 (34.9% advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core β€” the metric most relevant to gaming β€” records 2,602 vs 2,605, a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,244 vs 10,348 (8.3% advantage for the EPYC 4244P). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.

FeatureEPYC 4244PRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz
4 GHz+5%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
8 MB+700%
Process
5 nm
4 nm-20%
Architecture
Raphael (2023βˆ’2025)
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
PassMark
27,164
27,318
Cinebench R23 Multi
11,244
16,000+42%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,602
2,605
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,244+9%
10,348
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4244P versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS β€” the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 7.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4244P supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB β€” 200% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4244P) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) β€” the EPYC 4244P offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4244P) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).

FeatureEPYC 4244PRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Socket
AM5
FP7/FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200
DDR5-5600+8%
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB+200%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
28+40%
20
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) vs Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). Both include integrated graphics β€” Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4244P) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.

FeatureEPYC 4244PRyzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon Graphics
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
β€”
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Yes
Target Use
Entry Server
β€”