EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 5317

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 5317 Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4244P

6 / 12

27,164

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 5317

12 / 24

27,448

+1.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 5317 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 5317: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4244P

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (27,164 vs 27,448).

Xeon Gold 5317

2021

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4244P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,088 MSRP, while EPYC 4244P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while EPYC 4244P moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4244P better than Xeon Gold 5317?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4244P is ahead with a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5317 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark. EPYC 4244P also has the bigger cache pool with 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Gold 5317 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4244P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 5317 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4244P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,088 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon Gold 5317 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. Xeon Gold 5317 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (25.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4244P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, 77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB), and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4244P vs Xeon Gold 5317 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4244P

The EPYC 4244P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 27,164 points. Launch price was $229.

Xeon Gold 5317

The Xeon Gold 5317 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 27,448 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4244P packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5317 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon Gold 5317 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the EPYC 4244P versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5317 — a 34.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4244P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 4244P uses the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture (5 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4244P scores 27,164 against the Xeon Gold 5317's 27,448 — a 1% lead for the Xeon Gold 5317. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 4244P vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon Gold 5317.

Feature	EPYC 4244P	Xeon Gold 5317
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	12 / 24+100%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+42%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+27%	3 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB (total)+78%	18 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	5 nm-50%	10 nm
Architecture	Raphael (2023−2025)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	27,164	27,448+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	11,244	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,602	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,244	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4244P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 5317 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	EPYC 4244P	Xeon Gold 5317
Socket	AM5	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5200	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	28	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4244P) / not specified (Xeon Gold 5317). The EPYC 4244P includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon Gold 5317 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 4244P targets Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4244P rivals Xeon E-2436.