Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon E-2468

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon E-2468 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

8 / 16

26,864

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2468

8 / 16

26,652

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon E-2468 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon E-2468: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Xeon E-2468

2023

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,652 vs 26,864).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than Xeon E-2468?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2468 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon E-2468 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2468

The Xeon E-2468 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 26,652 points. Launch price was $426.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and Xeon E-2468 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS versus 5.2 GHz on the Xeon E-2468 — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2468 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E-2468 uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 26,864 against the Xeon E-2468's 26,652 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2468.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS	Xeon E-2468
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+27%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
PassMark	26,864	26,652

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2468 uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.