Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon Gold 6150

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon Gold 6150 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

8 / 16

26,864

+1.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon Gold 6150

18 / 36

26,447

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon Gold 6150 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon Gold 6150: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 165W, a 137W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6150, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.

Xeon Gold 6150

2017

Why buy it

✅+54.7% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,447 vs 26,864).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,358 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌489.3% higher power demand at 165W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than Xeon Gold 6150?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6150 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 25.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon Gold 6150 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $3,358 MSRP, and it still gives you a 25.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon Gold 6150 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2017), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 18/36. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Xeon Gold 6150 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon Gold 6150

The Xeon Gold 6150 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 24.75 MB. L2 cache: 18 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 26,447 points. Launch price was $3,358.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6150 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon Gold 6150 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6150 — a 31.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 26,864 against the Xeon Gold 6150's 26,447 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs 24.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6150.

Feature	Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS	Xeon Gold 6150
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	18 / 36+125%
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz+38%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+22%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	24.75 MB+55%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	18 MB+1700%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	26,864+2%	26,447

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Gold 6150 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.