Ryzen 9 3900XT vs EPYC 7302P
Ryzen 9 3900XT
EPYC 7302P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900XT
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7302P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900XT | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($390) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse 2 (2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900XT | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($390) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900XT and EPYC 7302P
Ryzen 9 3900XT
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse 2 (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 32,512 points. Launch price was $499.
EPYC 7302P
The EPYC 7302P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 155 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 32,690 points. Launch price was $825.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 3900XT packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the EPYC 7302P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7302P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900XT versus 3.3 GHz on the EPYC 7302P — a 35% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the Matisse 2 (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the EPYC 7302P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 32,512 against the EPYC 7302P's 32,690 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7302P. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,400 vs 11,500 (46.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,750 vs 1,320, a 28% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900XT that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,500 vs 11,450 (8.7% advantage for the EPYC 7302P). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900XT vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7302P.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900XT | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+42% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+27% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+100% | 32 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse 2 (2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 32,512 | 32,690 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,400+60% | 11,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,750+33% | 1,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,500 | 11,450+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7302P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The EPYC 7302P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) vs 8 (EPYC 7302P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) vs 128 (EPYC 7302P) — the EPYC 7302P offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) and SP3 (EPYC 7302P).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900XT | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3900XT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900XT) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7302P). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900XT targets Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming, EPYC 7302P targets Server / Virtualization. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900XT rivals Core i9-10900K; EPYC 7302P rivals Xeon Gold 6230.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900XT | EPYC 7302P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming | Server / Virtualization |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 3900XT and EPYC 7302P
