Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Core i5-13400F
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Core i5-13400F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 3900XT
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13400F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900XT | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($390) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse 2 (2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 3900XT | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+67%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($390) | ✅ More affordable ($180) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 3900XT and Core i5-13400F
Ryzen 9 3900XT
The Ryzen 9 3900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse 2 (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 32,512 points. Launch price was $499.
Core i5-13400F
The Core i5-13400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 25,029 points. Launch price was $196.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 3900XT packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i5-13400F offers 10 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 9 3900XT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3900XT versus 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13400F — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the Matisse 2 (2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Core i5-13400F uses Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3900XT scores 32,512 against the Core i5-13400F's 25,029 — a 26% lead for the Ryzen 9 3900XT. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18,400 vs 16,211 (12.6% advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900XT). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,750 vs 2,407, a 31.6% lead for the Core i5-13400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,500 vs 11,408 (8.3% advantage for the Core i5-13400F). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3900XT vs 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-13400F.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900XT | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+20% | 10 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz+2% | 4.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+52% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+220% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse 2 (2020) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 32,512+30% | 25,029 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 18,400+14% | 16,211 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,750 | 2,407+38% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,500 | 11,408+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 3900XT uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i5-13400F uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3900XT versus DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-13400F — the Core i5-13400F supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-13400F supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) vs 20 (Core i5-13400F) — the Ryzen 9 3900XT offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 3900XT) and H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-13400F).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900XT | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3900XT has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3900XT) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13400F). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 3900XT targets Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming, Core i5-13400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 3900XT rivals Core i9-10900K; Core i5-13400F rivals Ryzen 5 7600.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900XT | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Workstation / Enthusiast Gaming | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 3900XT launched at $499 MSRP, while the Core i5-13400F debuted at $196. At current prices ($390 vs $180), the Core i5-13400F is $210 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 3900XT delivers 83.4 pts/$ vs 139.1 pts/$ for the Core i5-13400F — making the Core i5-13400F the 50.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 3900XT | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $196-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $390 | $180-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.4 | 139.1+67% |
| Release Date | 2020 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 3900XT and Core i5-13400F
