Ryzen 9 3950X vs Xeon W-3335

Ryzen 9 3950X vs Xeon W-3335 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 9 3950X

16 / 32

38,519

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Xeon W-3335

16 / 32

39,293

+2.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 9 3950X vs Xeon W-3335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 9 3950X vs Xeon W-3335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 9 3950X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Costs $681 less on MSRP ($749 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Delivers 87.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.4 vs 27.5 PassMark/$ ($749 MSRP vs $1,430 MSRP).
✅Draws 105W instead of 250W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,519 vs 39,293).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3335, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅+2% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.5 vs 51.4 PassMark/$ ($1,430 MSRP vs $749 MSRP).
❌138.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 105W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 9 3950X better than Xeon W-3335?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 9 3950X is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 9 3950X is the better buy right now. Ryzen 9 3950X comes in $681 cheaper on MSRP at $749 MSRP versus $1,430 MSRP, and it still gives you a 20.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon W-3335 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 2% better PassMark. It is also 87.2% better value on MSRP (51.4 vs 27.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-3335 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 16/32, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 9 3950X vs Xeon W-3335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 9 3950X

The Ryzen 9 3950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,519 points. Launch price was $799.

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 9 3950X and Xeon W-3335 share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3950X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 16.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3950X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3950X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3335 uses Ice Lake-W (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 3950X scores 38,519 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 2% lead for the Xeon W-3335. L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 3950X vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-3335.

Feature	Ryzen 9 3950X	Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+18%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+3%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB+167%	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	38,519	39,293+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 3950X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 3950X) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 3950X) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3950X) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

Feature	Ryzen 9 3950X	Xeon W-3335
Socket	AM4	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	3200
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	64+167%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 3950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3335 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3950X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). Direct competitor: Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.

Feature	Ryzen 9 3950X	Xeon W-3335
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 9 3950X was priced at $749, while the Xeon W-3335 came in at $1430. On launch pricing ($749 vs $1430), Ryzen 9 3950X was $681 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 3950X delivers 51.4 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3335 — making the Ryzen 9 3950X the 60.7% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 9 3950X	Xeon W-3335
MSRP	$749-48%	$1430
Performance per Dollar	51.4+87%	27.5
Release Date	2019	2021

Search Ryzen 9 3950X on Amazon

Search Xeon W-3335 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.