
M4 Pro (14 cores)

Ryzen 9 3950X
M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Ryzen 9 3950X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Ryzen 9 3950X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Ryzen 9 3950X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 105W, a 101W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core), while Ryzen 9 3950X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 3950X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (38,127 vs 38,519).
Ryzen 9 3950X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $749 MSRP, while M4 Pro (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2525% higher power demand at 105W vs 4W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while M4 Pro (14 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while M4 Pro (14 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 3950X better than M4 Pro (14 cores)?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Ryzen 9 3950X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
M4 Pro (14 cores)
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.


Ryzen 9 3950X
The Ryzen 9 3950X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 38,519 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The M4 Pro (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 9 3950X offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 3950X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 3950X — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 3950X (base: 2.59 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 9 3950X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (14 cores) scores 38,127 against the Ryzen 9 3950X's 38,519 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 9 3950X.
| Feature | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.59 GHz | 3.5 GHz+35% |
| L3 Cache | — | 64 MB |
| L2 Cache | — | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | — | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 38,127 | 38,519+1% |
Memory & Platform
The M4 Pro (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 3950X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 3950X — the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 166.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 3950X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 3950X). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 3950X) — the Ryzen 9 3950X offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) and X570,B550 (Ryzen 9 3950X).
| Feature | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | none | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8533+167% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 128 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 0 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 3950X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 3950X). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the Ryzen 9 3950X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V.
| Feature | M4 Pro (14 cores) | Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core) | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) | AMD-V |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













