M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon 6724P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon 6724P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon 6724P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 Pro (14 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 210W, a 206W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core), while Xeon 6724P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6724P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon 6724P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (38,061 vs 38,127).
❌Launch MSRP is still $3,622 MSRP, while M4 Pro (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌5150% higher power demand at 210W vs 4W.
❌No integrated graphics, while M4 Pro (14 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6724P better than M4 Pro (14 cores)?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6724P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 Pro (14 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, M4 Pro (14 cores) is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 14 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6724P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6724P comes in at an unclear MSRP at $3,622 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that M4 Pro (14 cores) is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6724P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon 6724P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 Pro (14 cores)

The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon 6724P

The Xeon 6724P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 38,061 points. Launch price was $3,622.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon 6724P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6724P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6724P — a 4.5% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (14 cores) (base: 2.59 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon 6724P is built on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (14 cores) scores 38,127 against the Xeon 6724P's 38,061 — a 0.2% lead for the M4 Pro (14 cores).

Feature	M4 Pro (14 cores)	Xeon 6724P
Cores / Threads	14 / 14	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+5%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.59 GHz	3.6 GHz+39%
L3 Cache	—	72 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	2 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm	Intel 3 nm
Architecture	—	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	38,127	38,061
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6724P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6724P — the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6724P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 8 (Xeon 6724P). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 88 (Xeon 6724P) — the Xeon 6724P offers 88 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) and C741 (Xeon 6724P).

Feature	M4 Pro (14 cores)	Xeon 6724P
Socket	none	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	8533+33%	DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	4096 GB+6300%
RAM Channels	0	8
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	88

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6724P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6724P). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the Xeon 6724P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon 6724P targets Server. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V; Xeon 6724P rivals EPYC 9554.