M4 Pro (14 cores)
VS
Xeon W-3335

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon W-3335

M4 Pro (14 cores)

14 Cores14 Thrd4 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon W-3335

16 Cores32 Thrd250 WWMax: 4 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar M4 Pro (14 cores)

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
110%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
109%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
105%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
102%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
101%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
101%
#180
M4 Pro (14 cores)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
97%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
95%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
89%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3335

#307
Xeon W-3323
MSRP: $949|Avg: $500
107%
#308
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
MSRP: $1149|Avg: $100
106%
#309
Xeon W-2255
MSRP: $778|Avg: $350
105%
#310
Xeon Silver 4316
MSRP: $1126|Avg: $1200
105%
#311
Xeon w7-3545
MSRP: $2039|Avg: $2039
104%
#312
EPYC 7643P
MSRP: $2722|Avg: $2722
103%
#313
Xeon w5-3435X
MSRP: $1589|Avg: $163
103%
#314
Xeon Gold 6312U
MSRP: $1645|Avg: N/A
103%
#315
EPYC 7443
MSRP: $2010|Avg: $1800
103%
#316
Xeon Gold 6416H
MSRP: $1845|Avg: N/A
102%
#318
EPYC 7343
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $1350
101%
#319
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $225
101%
#320
EPYC 7413
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $450
101%
#321
Xeon W-3335
MSRP: $1430|Avg: $1200
100%
#322
EPYC 9354P
MSRP: $2730|Avg: $2205
100%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
97%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
97%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
96%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
96%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
95%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
94%
#331
EPYC 7402
MSRP: $1783|Avg: $2285
94%
#332
Xeon W-2235
MSRP: $555|Avg: $350
93%
#333
Xeon Gold 5317
MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100
92%
#334
Xeon W-2275
MSRP: $1112|Avg: $500
92%
#335
Xeon Gold 6430
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850
91%
#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($1,200) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon W-3335 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightM4 Pro (14 cores)Xeon W-3335
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Ice Lake-W (2021) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The M4 Pro (14 cores) ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($1,200 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightM4 Pro (14 cores)Xeon W-3335
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of M4 Pro (14 cores) and Xeon W-3335

M4 Pro (14 cores)

The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (14 cores) (base: 2.59 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon W-3335 is built on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (14 cores) scores 38,127 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 3% lead for the Xeon W-3335.

FeatureM4 Pro (14 cores)Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads
14 / 14
16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz+13%
4 GHz
Base Clock
2.59 GHz
3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-70%
10 nm
Architecture
Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark
38,127
39,293+3%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 64 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

FeatureM4 Pro (14 cores)Xeon W-3335
Socket
none
LGA4189
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
8533+167%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
64
4096+6300%
RAM Channels
0
8
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3335 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the Xeon W-3335 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.

FeatureM4 Pro (14 cores)Xeon W-3335
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d (macOS)
VT-x, VT-d