M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon W-3335

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon W-3335 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon W-3335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

M4 Pro (14 cores)

2024

Why buy it

✅Draws 4W instead of 250W, a 246W reduction.
✅Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core), while Xeon W-3335 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3335 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (38,127 vs 39,293).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3335, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Xeon W-3335

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $1,430 MSRP, while M4 Pro (14 cores) mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6150% higher power demand at 250W vs 4W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while M4 Pro (14 cores) moves to none and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while M4 Pro (14 cores) can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3335 better than M4 Pro (14 cores)?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-3335 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while M4 Pro (14 cores) is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3335 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3335 is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3335 is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3335 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $1,430 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (27.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

M4 Pro (14 cores) makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021) and a healthier platform with none and DDR5 instead of LGA4189. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

M4 Pro (14 cores) vs Xeon W-3335 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

M4 Pro (14 cores)

The M4 Pro (14 cores) is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2024 (1 year ago). It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 2.59 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 4 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 38,127 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon W-3335

The Xeon W-3335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 39,293 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The M4 Pro (14 cores) packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Xeon W-3335 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3335 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 4 GHz on the Xeon W-3335 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the M4 Pro (14 cores) (base: 2.59 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon W-3335 is built on the Ice Lake-W (2021) architecture. In PassMark, the M4 Pro (14 cores) scores 38,127 against the Xeon W-3335's 39,293 — a 3% lead for the Xeon W-3335.

Feature	M4 Pro (14 cores)	Xeon W-3335
Cores / Threads	14 / 14	16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+13%	4 GHz
Base Clock	2.59 GHz	3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	—	24 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	1 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	—	Ice Lake-W (2021)
PassMark	38,127	39,293+3%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The M4 Pro (14 cores) uses the none socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3335 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8533 on the M4 Pro (14 cores) versus 3200 on the Xeon W-3335 — the M4 Pro (14 cores) supports 166.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3335 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 64 — 6300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 8 (Xeon W-3335). PCIe lanes: 0 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs 64 (Xeon W-3335) — the Xeon W-3335 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Apple M4 (M4 Pro (14 cores)) and W790 (Xeon W-3335).

Feature	M4 Pro (14 cores)	Xeon W-3335
Socket	none	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	8533+167%	3200
Max RAM Capacity	64	4096+6300%
RAM Channels	0	8
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	0	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3335 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M4 Pro (14 cores)) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon W-3335). The M4 Pro (14 cores) includes integrated graphics (Apple M4 Pro GPU (20-core)), while the Xeon W-3335 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: M4 Pro (14 cores) rivals Core Ultra 7 258V; Xeon W-3335 rivals EPYC 7402.