Ryzen 9 4900H
VS
Core Ultra 7 258V

Ryzen 9 4900H vs Core Ultra 7 258V

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900H

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 258V

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
108%
#158
Core i9-13900H
MSRP: $617|Avg: N/A
106%
#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
104%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
103%
#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#169
Core i7-1280P
MSRP: $482|Avg: $482
99%
#173
Core Ultra 5 238V
MSRP: $454|Avg: $454
95%
#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
93%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
92%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 7 258V delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen 9 4900H in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen 9 4900HCore Ultra 7 258V
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen 9 4900HCore Ultra 7 258V
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($400)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 4900H and Core Ultra 7 258V

AMD

Ryzen 9 4900H

The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core Ultra 7 258V

The Core Ultra 7 258V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,947 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 4900H packs 8 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core Ultra 7 258V's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 258V — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 258V (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 4900H uses the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture (7 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 258V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 4900H scores 18,887 against the Core Ultra 7 258V's 18,947 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Ultra 7 258V. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 258V.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HCore Ultra 7 258V
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 8
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz+9%
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+50%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)+400%
Process
7 nm
3 nm-57%
Architecture
Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020)
Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark
18,887
18,947
Cinebench R23 Multi
10,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,750
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 4900H uses the FP6 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 258V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HCore Ultra 7 258V
Socket
FP6
FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 9 4900H) / VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 258V). The Core Ultra 7 258V includes integrated graphics (Arc 140V), while the Ryzen 9 4900H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 258V targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 258V rivals Ryzen 7 8840U.

FeatureRyzen 9 4900HCore Ultra 7 258V
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 140V
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming