
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2766NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 97W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2766NT, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon D-2766NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 6900HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,013 vs 24,248).
- ❌115.6% higher power demand at 97W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HX moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 6900HX
2022Xeon D-2766NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 97W, a 52W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2766NT, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 6900HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (24,013 vs 24,248).
- ❌115.6% higher power demand at 97W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 6900HX moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 6900HX better than Xeon D-2766NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 169 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 186 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 247 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 77 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 388 FPS | 442 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 437 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 355 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 368 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 323 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 262 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 606 FPS | 600 FPS |
| high | 606 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 606 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 606 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 606 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 591 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 513 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 536 FPS | 449 FPS |
| medium | 489 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 438 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 379 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 6900HX and Xeon D-2766NT


Ryzen 9 6900HX
Ryzen 9 6900HX
The Ryzen 9 6900HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,248 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon D-2766NT
Xeon D-2766NT
The Xeon D-2766NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 97 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 24,013 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 6900HX packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2766NT offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon D-2766NT has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 9 6900HX versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2766NT — a 45% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 6900HX (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 6900HX is built on the Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 6900HX scores 24,248 against the Xeon D-2766NT's 24,013 — a 1% lead for the Ryzen 9 6900HX. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 6900HX vs 20 MB on the Xeon D-2766NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 14 / 28+75% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+58% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz+65% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 20 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 6 nm-40% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+) (2022) | — |
| PassMark | 24,248 | 24,013 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 6900HX uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2766NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 6900HX | Xeon D-2766NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP7 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











