Ryzen 9 7940HS
VS
EPYC 7282

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs EPYC 7282

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7282

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7940HS

#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
107%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
106%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
102%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
101%
#105
Ryzen 9 7940HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
100%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
99%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
94%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7282

#218
Xeon Gold 5512U
MSRP: $1230|Avg: N/A
108%
#219
Xeon D-1733NT
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
107%
#220
Xeon 6520P
MSRP: $1295|Avg: $1295
106%
#221
Xeon Gold 6314U
MSRP: $2977|Avg: N/A
105%
#222
Xeon E-2478
MSRP: $568|Avg: $269
105%
#223
Xeon W-1390
MSRP: $494|Avg: $400
104%
#225
Xeon W-1250
MSRP: $285|Avg: $333
103%
#226
EPYC 9135
MSRP: $1214|Avg: $95
102%
#227
Xeon E-2378
MSRP: $362|Avg: $562
101%
#228
Xeon w3-2525
MSRP: $609|Avg: $800
101%
#230
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $368
100%
#232
EPYC 7282
MSRP: $650|Avg: $199
100%
#233
Xeon w5-2545
MSRP: $889|Avg: $1100
99%
#234
Xeon W-1250P
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
99%
#237
Xeon w3-2535
MSRP: $739|Avg: $800
97%
#239
EPYC 7313P
MSRP: $913|Avg: $824
97%
#240
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $60
96%
#241
Xeon w5-2555X
MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1145
96%
#242
Xeon E-2246G
MSRP: $311|Avg: $268
96%
#244
Xeon w3-2423
MSRP: $359|Avg: $300
95%
#245
EPYC 8434P
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $3137
94%
#247
EPYC 7443P
MSRP: $1337|Avg: $1045
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($199) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7282 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7282
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($199)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 9 7940HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($199 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7282
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($199)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HS and EPYC 7282

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7282 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7282 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 29,986 against the EPYC 7282's 30,201 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7282. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,443 vs 13,500 (25.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,646 vs 1,086, a 83.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,591 vs 7,638 (41.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 64 MB on the EPYC 7282.

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7282
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+63%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+43%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
64 MB+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
8 MB+700%
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
29,986
30,201
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,443+29%
13,500
Geekbench 6 Single
2,646+144%
1,086
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,591+52%
7,638
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7282 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 8 (EPYC 7282). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 128 (EPYC 7282) — the EPYC 7282 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282).

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7282
Socket
FP8
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+25%
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
4096 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282). The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7282 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance, EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H; EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7282
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V, SEV
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance
Edge Server / Entry Server