
Ryzen 9 7940HS vs EPYC 7282

Ryzen 9 7940HS

EPYC 7282
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7940HS
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7282
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7940HS | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($199) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 7940HS | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($199) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HS and EPYC 7282

Ryzen 9 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7282 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7282 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 29,986 against the EPYC 7282's 30,201 — a 0.7% lead for the EPYC 7282. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,443 vs 13,500 (25.5% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,646 vs 1,086, a 83.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,591 vs 7,638 (41.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 64 MB on the EPYC 7282.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HS | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+63% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+43% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 64 MB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 14 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 29,986 | 30,201 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,443+29% | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,646+144% | 1,086 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,591+52% | 7,638 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7282 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 8 (EPYC 7282). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 128 (EPYC 7282) — the EPYC 7282 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HS | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282). The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7282 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance, EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H; EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 7940HS | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | Thin-and-light Performance | Edge Server / Entry Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















