Ryzen 9 7940HS
VS
EPYC 7371

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs EPYC 7371

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

8 Cores16 Thrd35 WWMax: 5.2 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 7940HS

#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
107%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
106%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
102%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
101%
#105
Ryzen 9 7940HS
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
100%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
99%
#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
94%
#120
Core i7-11850HE
MSRP: $400|Avg: $75
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7371

#97
Xeon Silver 4314
MSRP: $395|Avg: $395
102%
#98
Xeon W-1350
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
102%
#99
Xeon W-1370P
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
102%
#106
Xeon Gold 6143
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
101%
#109
EPYC 7371
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#115
Xeon W-1370
MSRP: $323|Avg: $323
99%
#119
Xeon 6505P
MSRP: $563|Avg: $563
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7371 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7371
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen 9 7940HS ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7371
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 7940HS and EPYC 7371

AMD

Ryzen 9 7940HS

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 29,986 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 9 7940HS packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7371 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7371 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 — a 31.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS (base: 4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7371 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 29,986 against the EPYC 7371's 30,156 — a 0.6% lead for the EPYC 7371. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,443 vs 15,000 (15.1% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,646 vs 1,216, a 74.1% lead for the Ryzen 9 7940HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,591 vs 6,941 (50.2% advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371.

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7371
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
5.2 GHz+37%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+29%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
16 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
4 nm-71%
14 nm
Architecture
Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark
29,986
30,156
Cinebench R23 Multi
17,443+16%
15,000
Geekbench 6 Single
2,646+118%
1,216
Geekbench 6 Multi
11,591+67%
6,941
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7371 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 7940HS versus DDR4-2666 on the EPYC 7371 — the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 8 (EPYC 7371). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs 128 (EPYC 7371) — the EPYC 7371 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8,FP7 (Ryzen 9 7940HS) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7371).

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7371
Socket
FP8
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600+25%
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
2048 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
128+540%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 7940HS) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371). The Ryzen 9 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the EPYC 7371 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 7940HS targets Thin-and-light Performance, EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 7940HS rivals Core i9-13900H; EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.

FeatureRyzen 9 7940HSEPYC 7371
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Thin-and-light Performance
High-frequency Server Workloads