Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs Xeon W-3245
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Xeon W-3245
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Performance Per Dollar Xeon W-3245
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Cascade Lake (2019−2020) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+503%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($200) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon W-3245
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon W-3245
The Xeon W-3245 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 31,089 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon W-3245 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245 — a 6.7% clock advantage for the Xeon W-3245 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon W-3245 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 scores 31,251 against the Xeon W-3245's 31,089 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 17,500 vs 18,000 (2.8% advantage for the Xeon W-3245). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,688 vs 1,353, a 22% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 11,698 (15.7% advantage for the Xeon W-3245). L3 cache: 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 32+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz | 4.6 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB+191% | 22 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB | 16 MB+167% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 31,251 | 31,089 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 17,500 | 18,000+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,688+25% | 1,353 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 10,000 | 11,698+17% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon W-3245 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245) — the Xeon W-3245 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) and C621 (Xeon W-3245).
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 64+167% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon W-3245 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3245). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation, Xeon W-3245 targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900; Xeon W-3245 rivals Threadripper 2950X.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Professional Content Creation | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 launched at $499 MSRP, while the Xeon W-3245 debuted at $2199. At current prices ($200 vs $1200), the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is $1000 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 delivers 156.3 pts/$ vs 25.9 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3245 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 the 143.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 | Xeon W-3245 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-77% | $2199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-83% | $1200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 156.3+503% | 25.9 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 and Xeon W-3245
