Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Core Ultra 7 265H
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Core Ultra 7 265H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Strix Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-H (2025) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 7 265H
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 35,133 points. Launch price was $499.
Core Ultra 7 265H
The Core Ultra 7 265H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-H (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): 26 MB + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 34,702 points. Launch price was $471.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265H — a 3.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265H (base: 2 GHz vs 4.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses Arrow Lake-H (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 35,133 against the Core Ultra 7 265H's 34,702 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs 24 MB on the Core Ultra 7 265H.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 16 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.3 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 4.5 GHz+125% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 24 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point (2024−2025) | Arrow Lake-H (2025) |
| PassMark | 35,133+1% | 34,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 7 265H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 7500 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus 8400 on the Core Ultra 7 265H — the Core Ultra 7 265H supports 11.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports up to 256 of RAM compared to 128 — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs 28 (Core Ultra 7 265H) — the Core Ultra 7 265H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) and BGA 2049 (Core Ultra 7 265H).
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 7500 | 8400+12% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256+100% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265H). Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon 890M (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) and Intel Arc 140T GPU (Core Ultra 7 265H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Core Ultra 7 265H rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Core Ultra 7 265H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 890M | Intel Arc 140T GPU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 7 265H
