Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
Xeon Platinum 8268
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8268 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8268 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8268: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 205W, a 177W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 890M, while Xeon Platinum 8268 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Platinum 8268, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Platinum 8268
2019Why buy it
- ✅+49% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (35,081 vs 35,133).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $6,302 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌632.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 better than Xeon Platinum 8268?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Xeon Platinum 8268 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 35,133 points. Launch price was $499.
Xeon Platinum 8268
The Xeon Platinum 8268 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2018 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake-SP (2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 35,081 points. Launch price was $6,302.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8268 has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — a 26.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the Strix Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses Cascade Lake-SP (2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 35,133 against the Xeon Platinum 8268's 35,081 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs 35.75 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8268.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24 | 24 / 48+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+31% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 35.75 MB (total)+49% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Point (2024−2025) | Cascade Lake-SP (2018) |
| PassMark | 35,133 | 35,081 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 24,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,394 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,046 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 7500 on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Platinum 8268 — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 supports 155.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8268 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs 6 (Xeon Platinum 8268). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs 48 (Xeon Platinum 8268) — the Xeon Platinum 8268 offers 32 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP8 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) and C621,Lewisburg (Xeon Platinum 8268).
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 7500+156% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 1024 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 48+200% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Platinum 8268). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 890M), while the Xeon Platinum 8268 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8268 targets High-end Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 rivals Core Ultra 9 185H; Xeon Platinum 8268 rivals EPYC 7452.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 890M | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | High-end Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 was priced at $0, while the Xeon Platinum 8268 came in at $6302. On launch pricing ($0 vs $6302), Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 was $6302 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Xeon Platinum 8268 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $6302 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 5.6 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Xeon Platinum 8268
