Ryzen AI Max+ 395
VS
Core Ultra 9 275HX

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Core Ultra 9 275HX

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

24 Cores24 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.4 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 275HX

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
117%
#36
Core i5-11500B
MSRP: $185|Avg: $185
107%
#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
102%
#43
Core Ultra 9 275HX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#49
Core i9-12900HX
MSRP: $606|Avg: N/A
96%
#57
Ryzen AI 9 365
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core Ultra 9 275HX delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 in both compute-intensive tasks (1.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightRyzen AI Max+ 395Core Ultra 9 275HX
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-HX (2025) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen AI Max+ 395Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Core Ultra 9 275HX

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

Intel

Core Ultra 9 275HX

The Core Ultra 9 275HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Arrow Lake-HX (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2114. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 56,018 points. Launch price was $600.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 275HX offers 24 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 9 275HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 275HX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses Arrow Lake-HX (2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 55,025 against the Core Ultra 9 275HX's 56,018 — a 1.8% lead for the Core Ultra 9 275HX. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 275HX.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ 395Core Ultra 9 275HX
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
24 / 24+50%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz
5.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock
3 GHz+11%
2.7 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)+78%
36 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)+200%
Process
4 nm
3 nm-25%
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Arrow Lake-HX (2025)
PassMark
55,025
56,018+2%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,835
Geekbench 6 Multi
17,908
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 9 275HX uses FCBGA2114 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 275HX — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 275HX supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 2 (Core Ultra 9 275HX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 275HX) — the Core Ultra 9 275HX offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) and HM870,WM880 (Core Ultra 9 275HX).

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ 395Core Ultra 9 275HX
Socket
FP11
FCBGA2114
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
8000+159900%
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
128
256 GB+209715100%
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
24+50%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 9 275HX). Both include integrated graphics AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) and Intel Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 9 275HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 9 275HX targets High-End Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX; Core Ultra 9 275HX rivals Ryzen 9 9955HX.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ 395Core Ultra 9 275HX
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon 8060S
Intel Arc Graphics
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
High-End Gaming Laptop