Ryzen AI Max+ 395
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 280W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while Ryzen Threadripper 3960X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +32.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅450% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (54,763 vs 55,025).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,399 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌409.1% higher power demand at 280W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 54,763 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (base: 3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 55,025 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X's 54,763 — a 0.5% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+13% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+27% |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 55,025 | 54,763 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 34,260 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,270 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 150% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) and AMD TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8000+150% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 88+450% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3960X). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX; Ryzen Threadripper 3960X rivals Core i9-10900X.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 8060S | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was priced at $0, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($0 vs $1399), Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was $1399 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 39.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
