EPYC 8324P
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 8324P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+3.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅500% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max+ 395 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,895 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max+ 395 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8060S, while EPYC 8324P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (55,025 vs 57,127).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max+ 395 better than EPYC 8324P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 8324P vs Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 8324P
The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.
Processing Power
The EPYC 8324P packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (base: 2.65 GHz vs 3 GHz). The EPYC 8324P uses the Siena (2023−2024) architecture (5 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 8324P scores 57,127 against the Ryzen AI Max+ 395's 55,025 — a 3.7% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+100% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 3 GHz | 5.1 GHz+70% |
| Base Clock | 2.65 GHz | 3 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total)+100% | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm-20% |
| Architecture | Siena (2023−2024) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 57,127+4% | 55,025 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 8324P uses the SP6 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 8324P versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8324P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 128 — 800% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 6 (EPYC 8324P) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). PCIe lanes: 96 (EPYC 8324P) vs 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) — the EPYC 8324P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP6 (EPYC 8324P) and FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395).
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP6 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800 | 8000+67% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1152+800% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 6+50% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 96+500% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 8324P) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 8324P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y; Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | AMD Radeon 8060S |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 8324P was priced at $1895, while the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($1895 vs $0), Ryzen AI Max+ 395 was $1895 cheaper.
| Feature | EPYC 8324P | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1895 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.1 | — |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 8324P and Ryzen AI Max+ 395
