Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs EPYC 7401
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
EPYC 7401
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7401
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($450) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and EPYC 7401
Ryzen AI Max+ 395
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.
EPYC 7401
The EPYC 7401 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 55,280 points. Launch price was $1,850.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7401 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7401 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7401 — a 51.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (base: 3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7401 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 55,025 against the EPYC 7401's 55,280 — a 0.5% lead for the EPYC 7401. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+70% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz+50% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 64 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core)+100% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-71% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 55,025 | 55,280 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7401 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 2666 on the EPYC 7401 — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7401 supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 8 (EPYC 7401). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 128 (EPYC 7401) — the EPYC 7401 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) and SP3 (EPYC 7401).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 8000+200% | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 | 2048+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 128+700% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7401). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 7401 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX; EPYC 7401 rivals Xeon Silver 4114.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon 8060S | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 launched at $0 MSRP, while the EPYC 7401 debuted at $1500. At current prices ($0 vs $450), the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is $450 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | EPYC 7401 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | — | 122.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and EPYC 7401
