Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Ryzen 9 7940HX

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 9 7940HX leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.6% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Ryzen 9 7940HX
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)	✨ Modern (Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) / 5 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Ryzen 9 7940HX
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen AI Max+ 395 Benchmark Check

Ryzen 9 7940HX Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Ryzen 9 7940HX

Ryzen AI Max+ 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 55,025 points. Launch price was $450.

Ryzen 9 7940HX

The Ryzen 9 7940HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2024-01-01. It is based on the Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 53,628 points. Launch price was $600.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Ryzen 9 7940HX share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 7940HX — a 1.9% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 7940HX (base: 3 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 9 7940HX uses Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 55,025 against the Ryzen 9 7940HX's 53,628 — a 2.6% lead for the Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Both processors carry 64 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Ryzen 9 7940HX
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	16 / 32
Boost Clock	5.1 GHz	5.2 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3 GHz+25%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	64 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	1 MB (per core)
Process	4 nm-20%	5 nm
Architecture	Strix Halo (2025)	Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
PassMark	55,025+3%	53,628

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 7940HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 versus 5200 on the Ryzen 9 7940HX — the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports 42.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 2 (Ryzen 9 7940HX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 7940HX) — the Ryzen 9 7940HX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 7940HX).

Feature	Ryzen AI Max+ 395	Ryzen 9 7940HX
Socket	FP11	FL1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	8000+54%	5200
Max RAM Capacity	128	128
RAM Channels	4+100%	2
ECC Support	✅	✅
PCIe Lanes	16	28+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — AMD Radeon 8060S (Ryzen AI Max+ 395) and AMD Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 7940HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ 395 rivals Core Ultra 9 285HX; Ryzen 9 7940HX rivals Core i9-13900HX.