Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Core i7-13700HX
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Core i7-13700HX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700HX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core i7-13700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($485) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core i7-13700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($485) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Core i7-13700HX
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Core i7-13700HX
The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-13700HX offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 versus 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core i7-13700HX uses Raptor Lake-HX (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 31,508 against the Core i7-13700HX's 32,157 — a 2% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core i7-13700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+7% | 30 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) |
| PassMark | 31,508 | 32,157+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,886 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,136 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-13700HX uses FCBGA1964 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8000 memory speed. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs 2 (Core i7-13700HX). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) and Mobile (Core i7-13700HX).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core i7-13700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | FCBGA1964 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000 | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) and UHD Graphics (Core i7-13700HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core i7-13700HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 8050S | UHD Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Enterprise AI Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Core i7-13700HX
