Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
2025Why buy it
- ✅+139.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 250W, a 195W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (16,500 vs 33,213).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+101.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,206 vs 2,886).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,799 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌354.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 moves to FP11 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 better than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 17.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 31,508 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 1.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 33,213 (67.2% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,886 vs 1,206, a 82.1% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,136 vs 7,612 (60% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+19% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total) | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-67% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 31,508 | 31,945+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | 33,213+101% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,886+139% | 1,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,136+86% | 7,612 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports 172.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000+173% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 8+100% | 4 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 64+220% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max; Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 8050S | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Enterprise AI Mobile | Extreme Content Creation |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
