Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Core i7-13700HX
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-13700HX
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($485) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-HX (2023) / Intel 7 nm) | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($485) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-13700HX and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Core i7-13700HX
The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 2% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 24+100% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+71% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX (2023) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| PassMark | 32,157+2% | 31,508 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,886 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,136 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP11 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | LPDDR5x-8000 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-13700HX) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.
| Feature | Core i7-13700HX | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | Radeon 8050S |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise AI Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i7-13700HX and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
