Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-13700HX

16 / 24

32,157

+2.1%

31,508

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-13700HX

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $485 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (31,508 vs 32,157).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-13700HX better than Ryzen AI Max PRO 385?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is ahead with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700HX pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-13700HX is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 24 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-13700HX is the better buy right now. Core i7-13700HX comes in at an unclear MSRP at $485 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 6.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (66.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i7-13700HX vs Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-13700HX

The Core i7-13700HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,157 points. Launch price was $485.

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-13700HX packs 16 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i7-13700HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i7-13700HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-13700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX (2023) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-13700HX scores 32,157 against the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385's 31,508 — a 2% lead for the Core i7-13700HX. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700HX vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Cores / Threads	16 / 24+100%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	5 GHz	5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.6 GHz+71%
L3 Cache	30 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+7%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+100%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX (2023)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	32,157+2%	31,508
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,886
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	14,136

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-13700HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i7-13700HX versus LPDDR5x-8000 on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 — the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-13700HX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-13700HX) vs 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Mobile (Core i7-13700HX) and Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385).

Feature	Core i7-13700HX	Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Socket	FCBGA1964	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800	LPDDR5x-8000+67%
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB+50%	128 GB
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	20	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-13700HX) vs AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics (Core i7-13700HX) and Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max.