Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
VS
Ryzen 7 8700G

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Ryzen 7 8700G

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

8 Cores16 Thrd55 WWMax: 5 GHz2025
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 8700G

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
118%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
116%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
116%
#184
Core Ultra 7 266V
MSRP: $520|Avg: $520
112%
#185
Ryzen 7 5825C
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
110%
#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
102%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
102%
#189
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 8700G

#122
Core i3-13100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $119
105%
#123
Ryzen 5 5600G
MSRP: $259|Avg: $160
105%
#124
Core Ultra 9 285K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
104%
#125
Core i5-13400E
MSRP: $221|Avg: $221
104%
#126
Ryzen 7 8700F
MSRP: $270|Avg: $257
103%
#127
Core i9-14900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $480
103%
#128
Core i7-12700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $285
102%
#129
Core i9-13900KF
MSRP: $599|Avg: $480
102%
#130
Core i7-12700
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
102%
#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
102%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
101%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
101%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
100%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
100%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
100%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
100%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
100%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
100%
#140
Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
99%
#141
Core i9-13900K
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#142
Core i3-14100
MSRP: $134|Avg: $131
99%
#143
Ryzen 5 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
98%
#144
Core i7-10700KF
MSRP: $405|Avg: $160
98%
#145
Core i5-11600K
MSRP: $262|Avg: $170
98%
#146
Core i7-13700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $400
97%
#147
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
MSRP: $149|Avg: $80
96%
#148
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $150
96%
#149
Core i9-12900KS
MSRP: $739|Avg: $385
96%
#150
Ryzen 5 5500X3D
MSRP: $185|Avg: $180
96%
#151
Core Ultra 7 265T
MSRP: $384|Avg: $362
96%
#152
Ryzen 3 3200GE
MSRP: $85|Avg: $64
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 leads in gaming performance. However, the Ryzen 7 8700G is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightRyzen AI Max PRO 385Ryzen 7 8700G
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($269)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Phoenix (2023−2024) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightRyzen AI Max PRO 385Ryzen 7 8700G
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($269)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Ryzen 7 8700G

AMD

Ryzen AI Max PRO 385

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.

AMD

Ryzen 7 8700G

The Ryzen 7 8700G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Phoenix (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,649 points. Launch price was $329.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Ryzen 7 8700G share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8700G — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8700G uses Phoenix (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 31,508 against the Ryzen 7 8700G's 31,649 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 8700G. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 18,000 (8.7% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700G). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,886 vs 2,720, a 5.9% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,136 vs 14,326 (1.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8700G). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8700G.

FeatureRyzen AI Max PRO 385Ryzen 7 8700G
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
5 GHz
5.1 GHz+2%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
32 MB (total)+100%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm
4 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Phoenix (2023−2024)
PassMark
31,508
31,649
Cinebench R23 Multi
16,500
18,000+9%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,886+6%
2,720
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,136
14,326+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 8700G uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8000 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8700G supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 8700G). Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) and X670,B650,A620 (Ryzen 7 8700G).

FeatureRyzen AI Max PRO 385Ryzen 7 8700G
Socket
FP11
AM5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5x-8000
DDR5-5200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
256 GB+100%
RAM Channels
8+300%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Both include integrated graphics Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 8700G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile, Ryzen 7 8700G targets High-end Desktop APU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max; Ryzen 7 8700G rivals Core i7-13700.

FeatureRyzen AI Max PRO 385Ryzen 7 8700G
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon 8050S
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Enterprise AI Mobile
High-end Desktop APU