Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs Core Ultra 5 225
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Core Ultra 5 225
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm) | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($200) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Core Ultra 5 225
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 31,508 points. Launch price was $499.
Core Ultra 5 225
The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.
Processing Power
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 scores 31,508 against the Core Ultra 5 225's 31,137 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,500 vs 17,020 (3.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,886 vs 2,653, a 8.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,136 vs 13,028 (8.2% advantage for the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385). L3 cache: 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 10+25% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+2% | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB (total)+60% | 20 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+200% |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm-25% |
| Architecture | Strix Halo (2025) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 31,508+1% | 31,137 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,500 | 17,020+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,886+9% | 2,653 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,136+9% | 13,028 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5x-8000 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs 2 (Core Ultra 5 225). PCIe lanes: 20 (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225) — the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Strix Halo platform (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225).
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP11 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5x-8000 | DDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 8+300% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max PRO 385) and Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 targets Enterprise AI Mobile, Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 rivals M3 Max; Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G.
| Feature | Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 8050S | Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Enterprise AI Mobile | Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 and Core Ultra 5 225
