Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
VS
EPYC 9174F

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs EPYC 9174F

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 9174F

16 Cores32 Thrd320 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9174F

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
772%
#1
Core i9-9990XE
MSRP: $2000|Avg: N/A
6%
#2
Xeon W-11855M
MSRP: $450|Avg: $200
14%
#3
Xeon W-11955M
MSRP: $623|Avg: $450
13%
#4
Xeon W-11865MLE
MSRP: $467|Avg: $350
13%
#5
Xeon W-11865MRE
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
12%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
146%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
129%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
100%
#16
EPYC 7302
MSRP: $978|Avg: $109
100%
#21
Xeon Platinum 8260M
MSRP: $7705|Avg: N/A
91%
#22
Xeon Platinum 8268
MSRP: $6302|Avg: N/A
90%
#24
Xeon Gold 6130H
MSRP: $1894|Avg: N/A
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($30) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 9174F is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 9174F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($30 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 9174F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and EPYC 9174F

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.

AMD

EPYC 9174F

The EPYC 9174F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 52,249 points. Launch price was $3,850.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and EPYC 9174F share an identical 16-core/32-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 versus 4.4 GHz on the EPYC 9174F — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 3 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9174F uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 51,646 against the EPYC 9174F's 52,249 — a 1.2% lead for the EPYC 9174F. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 9174F.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 9174F
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
16 / 32
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+16%
4.4 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
4.1 GHz+37%
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
256 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
Process
4 nm-20%
5 nm, 6 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Genoa (2022−2023)
PassMark
51,646
52,249+1%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9174F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 versus 4800 on the EPYC 9174F — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9174F supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 128 191.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) vs 12 (EPYC 9174F). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) vs 128 (EPYC 9174F) — the EPYC 9174F offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) and SP5 (EPYC 9174F).

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 9174F
Socket
FP11
SP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed
8000+67%
4800
Max RAM Capacity
128
6144+4700%
RAM Channels
4
12+200%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
128+700%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9174F). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 9174F requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX; EPYC 9174F rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 9174F
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon 8060S
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 launched at $0 MSRP, while the EPYC 9174F debuted at $194. At current prices ($0 vs $30), the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is $30 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 9174F
MSRP
$0-100%
$194
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$30
Performance per Dollar
1741.6
Release Date
2025
2022