Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
VS
EPYC 7502

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs EPYC 7502

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

16 Cores32 Thrd55 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 7502

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7502

#355
Xeon w7-3455
MSRP: $2489|Avg: $2625
110%
#356
EPYC 9334
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1810
109%
#357
Xeon w9-3575X
MSRP: $3789|Avg: $675
109%
#358
Xeon w7-3465X
MSRP: $2889|Avg: $468
108%
#359
Xeon Gold 6530
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1846
108%
#359
EPYC 9354
MSRP: $3420|Avg: $2498
108%
#361
Xeon Silver 4114
MSRP: $612|Avg: $30
107%
#362
EPYC 7532
MSRP: $2380|Avg: $225
106%
#363
Xeon W-2191B
MSRP: $1333|Avg: $39
106%
#364
Xeon Gold 5320
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1834
105%
#365
EPYC 7513
MSRP: $2840|Avg: $389
105%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
104%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
103%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
100%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
100%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
99%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
99%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
98%
#374
Xeon Gold 6448H
MSRP: $3658|Avg: N/A
98%
#375
Xeon D-2766NT
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $212
98%
#376
Xeon Gold 6442Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
97%
#377
Xeon 6740P
MSRP: $4650|Avg: $4650
97%
#378
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX
MSRP: $7999|Avg: $7999
96%
#379
Xeon W-3345
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $3319
96%
#380
Xeon Gold 6526Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
95%
#382
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
MSRP: $3995|Avg: N/A
94%
#383
EPYC 7551P
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $329
91%
#384
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
MSRP: $7349|Avg: $7999
90%
#385
EPYC 9375F
MSRP: $5306|Avg: $108
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (2025) utilizes 4 nm technology and DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 7502
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,299)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Strix Halo (2025) / 4 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The EPYC 7502 (2019) relies on 7 nm, 14 nm technology and **DDR4 Eight-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 7502
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($1,299)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and EPYC 7502

AMD

Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 51,646 points. Launch price was $500.

AMD

EPYC 7502

The EPYC 7502 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 52,107 points. Launch price was $2,600.

Processing Power

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 7502 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7502 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7502 — a 41.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses the Strix Halo (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 7502 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 51,646 against the EPYC 7502's 52,107 — a 0.9% lead for the EPYC 7502. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 7502.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 7502
Cores / Threads
16 / 32
32 / 64+100%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+52%
3.35 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+20%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
64 MB (total)
128 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512K (per core)
Process
4 nm-43%
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Strix Halo (2025)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
51,646
52,107
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses the FP11 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 7502 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 versus 3200 on the EPYC 7502 — the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports 85.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7502 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) vs 8 (EPYC 7502). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) vs 128 (EPYC 7502) — the EPYC 7502 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FP11 (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) and SP3 (EPYC 7502).

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 7502
Socket
FP11
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
8000+150%
3200
Max RAM Capacity
128
4096+3100%
RAM Channels
4
8+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
128+700%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7502). The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8060S), while the EPYC 7502 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 rivals Core Ultra 7 255HX; EPYC 7502 rivals Xeon Gold 6338.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 7502
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon 8060S
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 launched at $0 MSRP, while the EPYC 7502 debuted at $2600. At current prices ($0 vs $1299), the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is $1299 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen AI Max+ PRO 395EPYC 7502
MSRP
$0-100%
$2600
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$1299
Performance per Dollar
40.1
Release Date
2025
2019