Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Opteron 4386

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Opteron 4386

#1

Xeon Platinum 8454H

MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A

29148%

#6

Xeon Gold 6240R

MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A

5503%

#10

Xeon 6337P

MSRP: $60|Avg: $5

4889%

#15

EPYC 9174F

MSRP: $194|Avg: $30

3777%

#528

Xeon E5-2687W v3

MSRP: $2141|Avg: $749

95%

#529

Xeon Max 9480

MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980

90%

#530

Xeon E5-2689 v4

MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100

88%

#945

Opteron 4386

MSRP: $459|Avg: $459

100%

#946

Xeon E5-2640

MSRP: $885|Avg: N/A

100%

#947

Xeon E5-2643 v4

MSRP: $1552|Avg: $555

100%

#949

Xeon E5-2630 v2

MSRP: $1069|Avg: $1224

98%

#953

Xeon E5-1620

MSRP: $885|Avg: $70

93%

#955

Xeon E5462

MSRP: $342|Avg: $45

91%

#958

Xeon E5-4650 v2

MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48

89%

#959

Xeon E5-1620 v4

MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1600 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded R1600	Opteron 4386
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($459)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Seoul (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Opteron 4386 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Ryzen Embedded R1600	Opteron 4386
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($459)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen Embedded R1600 Benchmark Check

Opteron 4386 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Opteron 4386

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 4386

The Opteron 4386 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,273 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4386 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4386 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 4386 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Opteron 4386 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 4386 uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 scores 3,276 against the Opteron 4386's 3,273 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen Embedded R1600. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4386.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R1600	Opteron 4386
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.1 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512 kB (per core)	8192 kB+1500%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Zen (2017−2020)	Seoul (2012)
PassMark	3,276	3,273

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4386 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R1600	Opteron 4386
Socket	FP5	C32
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	128 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	✅
PCIe Lanes	—	42

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1600) / AMD-V (Opteron 4386). Primary use case: Opteron 4386 targets Server.

Feature	Ryzen Embedded R1600	Opteron 4386
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Opteron 4386 debuted at $459. At current prices ($0 vs $459), the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is $459 cheaper.