Ryzen Embedded R1600
VS
Xeon L5609

Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Xeon L5609

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2020
VS
Intel

Xeon L5609

4 Cores4 Thrd40 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
14432%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2725%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2421%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1870%
#427
EPYC 7702P
MSRP: $4425|Avg: N/A
100%
#428
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
MSRP: $9999|Avg: $9879.97
99%
#429
EPYC 7552
MSRP: $4025|Avg: $1650
99%
#431
Xeon Platinum 8360Y
MSRP: $5383|Avg: N/A
99%
#432
Xeon W-3245
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1200
98%
#433
Xeon Gold 6346
MSRP: $2708|Avg: $2195
97%
#735
Xeon L5609
MSRP: $229|Avg: $229
100%
#737
Xeon E3-1245 v3
MSRP: $490|Avg: $490
100%
#747
Xeon E5-2403 v2
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
97%
#748
Xeon E3-1285 v4
MSRP: $556|Avg: $200
97%
#750
Xeon E3-1260L
MSRP: $294|Avg: $270
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen Embedded R1600 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightRyzen Embedded R1600Xeon L5609
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Zen (2017−2020) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon L5609 (2010) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightRyzen Embedded R1600Xeon L5609
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($229)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Embedded R1600 and Xeon L5609

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Xeon L5609

The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.

Processing Power

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon L5609 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5609 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 versus 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 — a 50% clock advantage for the Ryzen Embedded R1600 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon L5609 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Embedded R1600 scores 3,276 against the Xeon L5609's 3,298 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon L5609. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5609.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1600Xeon L5609
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+67%
1.86 GHz
Base Clock
2.6 GHz+40%
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+200%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark
3,276
3,298
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5609 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1600Xeon L5609
Socket
FP5
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Xeon L5609 debuted at $229. At current prices ($0 vs $229), the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is $229 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen Embedded R1600Xeon L5609
MSRP
$0-100%
$229
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$229
Performance per Dollar
14.4
Release Date
2020
2010