
Core i3-4360T

Ryzen Embedded R1600
Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4360T
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4360T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 3,294).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4360T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-4360T better than Ryzen Embedded R1600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360T
The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen Embedded R1600
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-4360T and Ryzen Embedded R1600 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4360T. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+3% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+23% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 3,294 | 3,276 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1600). The Core i3-4360T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4360T was priced at $138, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($138 vs $0), Ryzen Embedded R1600 was $138 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.9 | — |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2020 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















