Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600

Intel

Core i3-4360T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2020
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 40% higher power demand at 35W vs 25W.

Ryzen Embedded R1600

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 25W instead of 35W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4360T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 3,294).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4360T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4360T better than Ryzen Embedded R1600?
Yes. Core i3-4360T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4360T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4360T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-4360T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4360T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $138 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (23.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded R1600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4360T vs Ryzen Embedded R1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1600

The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4360T and Ryzen Embedded R1600 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4360T. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i3-4360TRyzen Embedded R1600
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+3%
3.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+23%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
3,294
3,276
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4360TRyzen Embedded R1600
Socket
LGA1150
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded R1600). The Core i3-4360T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i3-4360TRyzen Embedded R1600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4360T was priced at $138, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($138 vs $0), Ryzen Embedded R1600 was $138 cheaper.

FeatureCore i3-4360TRyzen Embedded R1600
MSRP
$138
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
23.9
Release Date
2014
2020

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.