Core i3-4360T vs Xeon L5609
Core i3-4360T
Xeon L5609
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4360T is positioned at rank 709 and the Xeon L5609 is on rank 735, so the Core i3-4360T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4360T
Performance Per Dollar Xeon L5609
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i3-4360T | Xeon L5609 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($229) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Westmere-EP (2010−2011) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i3-4360T | Xeon L5609 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+472%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($40) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($229) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4360T and Xeon L5609
Core i3-4360T
The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.
Xeon L5609
The Xeon L5609 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 40 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4360T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon L5609 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon L5609 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 1.86 GHz on the Xeon L5609 — a 53% clock advantage for the Core i3-4360T (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon L5609 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the Xeon L5609's 3,298 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon L5609. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360T vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon L5609.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Xeon L5609 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+72% | 1.86 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+72% | 1.86 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 3,294 | 3,298 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon L5609 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Xeon L5609 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | LGA1366 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ✅ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T) / not specified (Xeon L5609). The Core i3-4360T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Xeon L5609 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Xeon L5609 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i3-4360T launched at $138 MSRP, while the Xeon L5609 debuted at $229. At current prices ($40 vs $229), the Core i3-4360T is $189 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4360T delivers 82.3 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the Xeon L5609 — making the Core i3-4360T the 140.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | Xeon L5609 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-40% | $229 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-83% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.3+472% | 14.4 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i3-4360T and Xeon L5609
