Core i3-4360T vs Opteron 4386

CPU

GPU

Core i3-4360T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Opteron 4386

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i3-4360T vs Opteron 4386 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4360T

2 / 4

3,294

+0.6%

3,273

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360T vs Opteron 4386 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360T vs Opteron 4386: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $321 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $459 MSRP).
✅Delivers 234.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 7.1 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $459 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Opteron 4386 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron 4386 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 8 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 4386, which brings 8 cores / 8 threads and 42 PCIe lanes.

Opteron 4386

2012

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 8 threads, plus 42 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅162.5% more PCIe lanes (42 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,273 vs 3,294).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($459 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4360T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4360T better than Opteron 4386?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron 4386 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-4360T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4360T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4360T is the better buy right now. Core i3-4360T comes in $321 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $459 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Opteron 4386 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 8.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 234.7% better value on MSRP (23.9 vs 7.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4360T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4360T vs Opteron 4386 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

Opteron 4386

The Opteron 4386 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Seoul (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: C32. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,273 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4360T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron 4386 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Opteron 4386 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 3.8 GHz on the Opteron 4386 — a 17.1% clock advantage for the Opteron 4386 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron 4386 uses Seoul (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the Opteron 4386's 3,273 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4360T. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360T vs 8192 kB (total) on the Opteron 4386.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Opteron 4386
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	8 / 8+300%
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.8 GHz+19%
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+3%	3.1 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	8192 kB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	8192 kB+3100%
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Seoul (2012)
PassMark	3,294	3,273

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 4386 uses C32 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360T versus DDR3-1866 on the Opteron 4386 — the Opteron 4386 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Opteron 4386 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-4360T) vs 42 (Opteron 4386) — the Opteron 4386 offers 26 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Opteron 4386
Socket	LGA1150	C32
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR3-1866+17%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	128 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	42+163%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T) vs AMD-V (Opteron 4386). The Core i3-4360T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron 4386 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop, Opteron 4386 targets Server.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Opteron 4386
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 4600	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-4360T was priced at $138, while the Opteron 4386 came in at $459. On launch pricing ($138 vs $459), Core i3-4360T was $321 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4360T delivers 23.9 pts/$ vs 7.1 pts/$ for the Opteron 4386 — making the Core i3-4360T the 108% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-4360T	Opteron 4386
MSRP	$138-70%	$459
Performance per Dollar	23.9+237%	7.1
Release Date	2014	2012

Search Core i3-4360T on Amazon

Search Opteron 4386 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.