A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4360T

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4360T Performance Spectrum

A10 PRO-7800B

4 / 4

3,317

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4360T

2 / 4

3,294

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4360T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4360T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7800B

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4360T.

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7800B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,294 vs 3,317).
❌Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while A10 PRO-7800B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10 PRO-7800B.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 PRO-7800B better than Core i3-4360T?

Yes. A10 PRO-7800B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10 PRO-7800B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 PRO-7800B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10 PRO-7800B is still the much better call for a fresh build. A10 PRO-7800B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4360T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10 PRO-7800B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 PRO-7800B vs Core i3-4360T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10 PRO-7800B

The A10 PRO-7800B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,317 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7800B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4360T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 PRO-7800B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the A10 PRO-7800B versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T — a 19.7% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7800B (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A10 PRO-7800B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4360T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7800B scores 3,317 against the Core i3-4360T's 3,294 — a 0.7% lead for the A10 PRO-7800B.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Core i3-4360T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.9 GHz+22%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+9%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Kaveri (2014−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,317	3,294
Geekbench 6 Single	446	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7800B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4360T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7800B versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360T — the A10 PRO-7800B supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A10 PRO-7800B	Core i3-4360T
Socket	FM2+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7800B) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10 PRO-7800B) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7800B targets Business Desktop, Core i3-4360T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7800B rivals Core i3-4160.