Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P

Intel

Core i3-4360T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

FX-9830P

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $12 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Delivers 8.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-9830P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,294 vs 3,298).

FX-9830P

2016

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
    • No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4360T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is FX-9830P better than Core i3-4360T?
    Yes. FX-9830P is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, FX-9830P is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-9830P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    FX-9830P is still the much better call for a fresh build. FX-9830P comes in 8.7% more expensive on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4360T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 8.6% better value on paper (23.9 vs 22.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    FX-9830P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i3-4360T

    The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

    AMD

    FX-9830P

    The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Core i3-4360T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-9830P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9830P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P — a 14.5% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9830P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the FX-9830P's 3,298 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-9830P.

    FeatureCore i3-4360TFX-9830P
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    4 / 4+100%
    Boost Clock
    3.2 GHz
    3.7 GHz+16%
    Base Clock
    3.2 GHz+7%
    3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256 kB (per core)
    1 MB (per module)+300%
    Process
    22 nm-21%
    28 nm
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
    PassMark
    3,294
    3,298
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9830P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i3-4360TFX-9830P
    Socket
    LGA1150
    FP4
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T) / not specified (FX-9830P). The Core i3-4360T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-9830P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.

    FeatureCore i3-4360TFX-9830P
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics 4600
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the Core i3-4360T was priced at $138, while the FX-9830P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($138 vs $150), Core i3-4360T was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4360T delivers 23.9 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the FX-9830P — making the Core i3-4360T the 8.2% better value option.

    FeatureCore i3-4360TFX-9830P
    MSRP
    $138-8%
    $150
    Performance per Dollar
    23.9+9%
    22.0
    Release Date
    2014
    2016

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.