
Core i3-4360T

FX-9830P
Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4360T
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $12 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 22.0 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while FX-9830P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,294 vs 3,298).
FX-9830P
2016Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 22.0 vs 23.9 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4360T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is FX-9830P better than Core i3-4360T?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4360T vs FX-9830P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4360T
The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

FX-9830P
The FX-9830P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 May 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per module). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,298 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i3-4360T packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the FX-9830P offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the FX-9830P has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T versus 3.7 GHz on the FX-9830P — a 14.5% clock advantage for the FX-9830P (base: 3.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-4360T uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-9830P uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4360T scores 3,294 against the FX-9830P's 3,298 — a 0.1% lead for the FX-9830P.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+7% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 1 MB (per module)+300% |
| Process | 22 nm-21% | 28 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 3,294 | 3,298 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4360T uses the LGA1150 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-9830P uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1150 | FP4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T) / not specified (FX-9830P). The Core i3-4360T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the FX-9830P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4360T targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4360T was priced at $138, while the FX-9830P came in at $150. On launch pricing ($138 vs $150), Core i3-4360T was $12 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4360T delivers 23.9 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the FX-9830P — making the Core i3-4360T the 8.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4360T | FX-9830P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $138-8% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.9+9% | 22.0 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















