A8-9600 vs Core i3-4360T

AMD

A8-9600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-4360T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

A8-9600 vs Core i3-4360T Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-9600 vs Core i3-4360T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-9600 vs Core i3-4360T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-9600

2017

Why buy it

  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core i3-4360T.

Trade-offs

  • 85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i3-4360T

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
  • 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,294 vs 3,295).
  • Launch MSRP is still $138 MSRP, while A8-9600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-9600.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-9600 better than Core i3-4360T?
Yes. A8-9600 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A8-9600 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-9600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A8-9600 is still the much better call for a fresh build. A8-9600 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $138 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4360T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (23.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1150.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A8-9600 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-9600 vs Core i3-4360T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A8-9600

The A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,295 points. Launch price was $78.

Intel

Core i3-4360T

The Core i3-4360T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 21 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,294 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A8-9600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4360T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-9600 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A8-9600 versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-4360T — a 6.1% clock advantage for the A8-9600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The A8-9600 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4360T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-9600 scores 3,295 against the Core i3-4360T's 3,294 — a 0% lead for the A8-9600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-9600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4360T.

FeatureA8-9600Core i3-4360T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+6%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+3%
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm
22 nm-21%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
3,295
3,294
Geekbench 6 Single
607
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,415
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-9600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4360T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A8-9600 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4360T — the A8-9600 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A8-9600) vs 16 (Core i3-4360T) — the Core i3-4360T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA8-9600Core i3-4360T
Socket
AM4
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+50%
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-9600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4360T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 Series (A8-9600) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4360T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-9600 targets Budget Desktop, Core i3-4360T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A8-9600 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureA8-9600Core i3-4360T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Series
HD Graphics 4600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget Desktop
Desktop