A8-9600
VS
Core i5-L16G7

A8-9600 vs Core i5-L16G7

AMD

A8-9600

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Core i5-L16G7

5 Cores5 Thrd7 WWMax: 3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A8-9600 is positioned at rank 387 and the Core i5-L16G7 is on rank 1040, so the A8-9600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A8-9600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5676%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5363%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3894%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1173%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
929%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
813%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
466%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
460%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
418%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
418%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
414%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
403%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
397%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
395%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
392%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
100%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
99%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
98%
#387
A8-9600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#392
A10-7860K
MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A
98%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
98%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
98%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
98%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
97%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-L16G7

#1028
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2514%
#1029
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2477%
#1030
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2274%
#1031
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2264%
#1032
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2243%
#1034
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2166%
#1035
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2077%
#1036
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2074%
#1037
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2018%
#1040
Core i5-L16G7
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
99%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1047
E2-3800
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#1048
Athlon X2 QL-66
MSRP: $150|Avg: $5
97%
#1049
Athlon II Neo K145
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
97%
#1050
Celeron P4600
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1051
Core 2 Duo U7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
96%
#1052
Pentium 987
MSRP: $134|Avg: $20
95%
#1053
Core i7-4910MQ
MSRP: $570|Avg: $570
95%
#1054
Pentium T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The A8-9600 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-L16G7 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.5% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA8-9600Core i5-L16G7
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Lakefield (2020) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA8-9600Core i5-L16G7
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A8-9600 and Core i5-L16G7

AMD

A8-9600

The A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,295 points. Launch price was $78.

Intel

Core i5-L16G7

The Core i5-L16G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Lakefield (2020) architecture. It features 5 cores and 5 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FC-CSP1016. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR4X-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 3,280 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The A8-9600 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-L16G7 offers 5 cores / 5 threads — the Core i5-L16G7 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the A8-9600 versus 3 GHz on the Core i5-L16G7 — a 12.5% clock advantage for the A8-9600 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A8-9600 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-L16G7 uses Lakefield (2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the A8-9600 scores 3,295 against the Core i5-L16G7's 3,280 — a 0.5% lead for the A8-9600. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A8-9600 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i5-L16G7.

FeatureA8-9600Core i5-L16G7
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
5 / 5+25%
Boost Clock
3.4 GHz+13%
3 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+121%
1.4 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+300%
512 kB
Process
28 nm
10 nm-64%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Lakefield (2020)
PassMark
3,295
3,280
Geekbench 6 Single
607
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,415
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-9600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-L16G7 uses FC-CSP1016 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2400 memory speed. The A8-9600 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A8-9600) vs 9 (Core i5-L16G7) — the Core i5-L16G7 offers 1 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA8-9600Core i5-L16G7
Socket
AM4
FC-CSP1016
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
LPDDR4x-4267
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+300%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
9+13%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A8-9600) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-L16G7). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 Series (A8-9600) and UHD Graphics (Core i5-L16G7) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A8-9600 targets Budget Desktop, Core i5-L16G7 targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A8-9600 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureA8-9600Core i5-L16G7
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7 Series
UHD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget Desktop
Mobile